Egel is a melting pot of ideas, lots of which I needed to cut in the end. So. Operators.
I have a scheme where one can overload operator definitions to work on different 'types' of operands. But the computational cost is high, maybe too high for such a simple language.
Maybe it's just enough to define an operator once? It's a small language and an expensive lookup for every mathematical operator applied is hefty, certainly since operators can be disambiguated by hand by using namespaces.
No comments:
Post a Comment